Menu

By Robert Kehr and Rachelle H. Cohen

Artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and other generative AI systems are rapidly becoming part of how people prepare for disputes, communicate with lawyers, and even develop litigation strategies. But a recent federal court ruling suggests that clients’ use of AI may create an unexpected risk: conversations with AI may be discoverable by the opposing side in a lawsuit.

On March 25, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued one of the most consequential copyright rulings for the music industry in years. The Court’s unanimous decision in Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment held that internet service providers (ISPs) are not liable for copyright infringement committed by their users unless the ISP intentionally induces the infringement or designs its service for the purposes of infringement.

For many aging seniors, their driver’s license represents independence and self-sufficiency. Families and friends, however, may worry that failing health and slowed reflexes will make driving dangerous for a loved one and others on the road – but could be reluctant to raise what is likely to be an emotionally charged issue.

To support efforts to protect vulnerable seniors, California allows plaintiffs who prevail on financial‑elder‑abuse claims to recover their attorney fees and costs from defendants. But when those protective efforts involve multiple, overlapping legal actions, how should the resulting fees be allocated?

When a prospective heir believes that others have unfairly interfered with the expected inheritance, is the proper venue to get those claims heard a civil court or probate court?

A federal court has given songwriters a notable victory, ruling that they can reclaim their copyright not just in the United States, but worldwide.