
Arbitration Agreements Must Be Fair, Not Just Look Fair
- by M. Laurie Murphy
Employers in a wide range of industries routinely ask employees to sign agreements requiring any work-related disputes to be resolved through arbitration rather than via litigation. They argue that arbitration is less costly, faster, and more private than going to court, thus benefitting workers and companies.

Standing Requires Being on Firm Ground
- by Lynda I. Chung
Settling even a relatively modest estate can sometimes require asking for intervention by a court. What squabbling heirs may not realize is that the first question a judge may consider is if all the parties have the legal right to participate in the dispute – what lawyers call “standing.”

Asking a Question Could Be Costly
- by Katharine B. Lau
While most wills and trusts are clearly worded and straightforward in expressing their intentions, it is not uncommon for some to contain phrases that are confusing or ambiguous, requiring a court to determine how the terms should be interpreted.

Employers Get a Break on Meal Breaks
- by David Krol
California law requires employers to provide a 30-minute meal break to non-exempt employees who work between 5 and 6 hours in a single shift, unless the meal break is “waived by mutual consent of both the employer and employee.” But the Labor Code, and the orders of the Industrial Wage Commission, the state agency which formulates California’s wage orders, don’t specify what form the waiver must take, or whether an employee can provide consent before working a particular shift.

Contracts Have Limits for Wrongdoers
- by Rachelle H. Cohen
Companies often spend significant time and resources negotiating contracts before entering into business relationships, especially where the parties intend to have a longstanding, on-going relationship. The expectation is that the terms negotiated in the contract will apply if any questions arise in the relationship, and courts typically enforce these terms if one business brings a claim that the other breached the agreement.

A Conflict of Interest Without Having a Client?
- by Robert L. Kehr
It is well understood that a lawyer can have a disqualifying conflict of interest by having conflicting duties to current clients or because of a conflict between the duties owed to a current and a former client. This is the reason that, when a prospective client contacts a lawyer about possibly representation, one of the lawyer's first steps is to conduct a “conflict check” – that is, to see if representing a potential new client would create a conflict of interest for the lawyer or the lawyer's firm because of a relationship with another current or former client.